domenica 18 novembre 2012

Aung San Suu Kyi's Nobel Peace Prize Speech: BBC's point of view





(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJxhcQzGl6A)

-What happened/ The facts:
On last 16th of June the Burmese pro-democracy campaigner, Aung San Suu Kyi, has finally given her acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize, 21 years after it was awarded1.
In 1991, she was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize but she couldn't go to receive the prize because she was under house arrest (imprisonment lasted almost 24 years). She was freed in late 2010.
-What BBC points out from the speech:

BBC highlights different parts of her speech in two reports about Aung San Suu Kyi's Nobel Speech .

In the first, entitled Suu Kyi says Nobel award meant Burma was not forgotten2, there is reproduced the part of speech in which she talks about the importance of Universal Declaration of Human Rights; in particular she appoints two highlights of Declaration:
“[...]disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspirations of the common people [...]”
“[...] it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law[...]”.
In these she has found her strength. She believes that democratic institutions and practices are necessary for the guarantee of human rights.
Now we can see the fruit of the endeavours of those who believe in democracy and in the human rights.
She continues the speech telling that we have to have faith in the future but she warns against blind faith and she urges the unconditional release of all political prisoners, saying "one prisoner of conscience is one too many".

The article also underlines the importance that San Suu Kyi has and has had for Universal peace. The Thorbjorn Jagland (Chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee) opening ceremony words are very significant:
In your isolation you have become a moral voice for the whole world”
a precious gift to the world community”.
One of the most important thing that the article points out is what had meant for San Suu Kyi receiving Nobel prize.
The prize it is like“a door in her heart”
“Winning the Nobel Peace Prize made her real once again. It had drawn her back into the wider human community”.
The Nobel Peace Prize has drew the attention of the world to the struggle for democracy and human rights in Burma”.
“Burma was not going to be forgotten”
The Nobel Peace Prize drew her once again into the world of other beings outside her isolation" 3

We find this part of speech in the second BBC's service “Suu Kyi in Oslo for Nobel speech” reported by Fergal Keane. He talks about Burma's transition and about violence in the north of the country. Here we find also an interview with Suu Kyi where she confirms her optimism about Burma's political future but not a blind optimism. We have to be aware of the challenges that still lie ahead.
For the journalist this is the day of her celebration.

BBC gives much importance to San Suu Kyi. We can understand it through various articles dedicated to her.
On BBC site we have also a specific page about her profile and her history (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11685977).

V.

1  Fergal Keane, Suu Kyi in Oslo for Nobel speech in http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-18471439
2 Suu Kyi says Nobel award meant Burma was not forgotten in http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18464946
3 A part of Suu Kyi Nobel speech in Suu Kyi says Nobel award meant Burma was not forgotten in http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18464946

2 commenti:

  1. I believe that Aung San Suu Kyi (or “The Lady” such as the Burmese call her) is a true example of courage and patience, directed to an increase of human rights standards in her country. I admire her because she was able to pressure the authority of the military junta (which has leading Myanmar since 1988) without the use of violence and catalyzing the attention of the international public opinion on her figure, like a symbol of the political repression and the lack of freedom of speech. As I could document me during my Bachelor thesis her work was at the base of the adoption of many International organizations’ declarations that condemned the regime, and the imposition of restrictive measures, such as economic sanctions. All this has surely pressured the authorities to begin a genuine democratic process.

    Just the fact the she was able to present her acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize, 21 years later, is surely a good news that demonstrates that something in Burma is really changing. 21 years ago, she didn’t go to draw her prize because, if she had been moved away from her country, maybe the Myanmar Government wouldn’t let her to come back.

    Even if the situation in her Burma is still precarious, Aung San Suu Kyi represents a source of hope for human right protection all over the world.

    Michael Massarutto

    RispondiElimina
  2. I completely agree with you. I also subscribe to your idea that she represents a source of hope for human right protection.

    Valeria Turozzi

    RispondiElimina